1) Do vaccines reduce infection, hospitalisation and death?
Short answer NO.
They do the opposite, they increase infection, hospitalisations and death.
The above article is using raw data from the UKHSA and the ONS which is flawed which will be explained later and negates any vaccine effectiveness shown.
2) “The vaccines do not reduce all-cause mortality, but rather produce genuine spikes in all-cause mortality shortly after vaccination.”
Dr. Martin Neil is Professor in Computer Science and Statistics at Queen Mary, University of London. Dr. Clare Craig is a Diagnostic Pathologist. Dr. Norman Fenton is Professor of Risk Information Management at Queen Mary University of London. The paper is also authored by Jonathan Engler, Joshua Guetzkow, Scott Mclachlan, Jessica Rose, Dan Russell and Joel Smalley.
Summarised here ……
3) The view that vaccines are effective in reducing hospitalisation and death is flawed due to a number of reasons including the ‘healthy vaccinee’ effect.
The vulnerable may well have been targeted to have the vaccine but those that are too ill or frail to have the vaccine and go on to be hospitalised or die will be classed as unvaccinated and sway the effectiveness of the jabs against the unvaccinated.
A study published last year by the U.S. CDC found that vaccinated people were less likely to die of non-Covid causes, suggesting that they’re inherently healthier and/or more risk averse than unvaccinated people.
4) Those who are unvaccinated that end up in hospital and die could quite easily be due to the “unhealthy unvaccinated” effect.
A rough sleeper or anyone else who is not on any health records who ends up in hospital is regarded as “unvaccinated”.
5) Someone who had their first vaccination less than 14 days previously is regarded as unvaccinated in some studies. So if they end up in hospital due to Covid or vaccine induced health problems similar or the same as Covid they are regarded as unvaccinated in the study even though it was the vaccine that caused it.
6) The vaccinated are also more likely to catch Covid within 14 days of their vaccine than the unvaccinated due to a compromised immune response.
7) The vaccinated have been told that it stops them needing hospital treatment which creates the placebo effect whereby a vaccinated person who catches Covid doesn’t feel the need to go to hospital because they’ve been told by a “higher authority” that they are protected. This skews the figures in favour of “Vaccine Effectiveness”.
Conversely an unvaccinated person with exactly the same symptoms have been told via propaganda they are likely to die and will therefore present themselves to hospital through fear which again skews the figures against the unvaccinated.
8) All these “healthy vaccinee”, “unhealthy unvaccinated” and vaccine induced Covid patients within 14 days of the jab (regarded as unvaccinated in some studies) are skewing the figures making the jabs look a lot more effective than they really are (if they are effective at all).
9) The ONS has also grossly underestimated the unvaccinated population and the data is flawed.
10) The people who gather the data for studies say that they are not allowed to show the health status of unvaccinated individuals as it would contravene data protection laws.
11) The UKHSA in the Vaccine Surveillance Report reference a number of studies to back up their claims that the vaccines are effective at preventing hospitalisation and death ……
6. Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C, Robertson C, Stowe J, Tessier E and
others. ‘Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on
COVID-19-related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in
England: test negative case-control study.’ British Medical Journal 2021: volume
373, n1,088.
7. Vasileiou E, Simpson CR, Robertson C, Shi T, Kerr S, Agrawal U and others.
‘Effectiveness of first dose of COVID-19 vaccines against hospital admissions in
Scotland: national prospective cohort study of 5.4 million people.’ 2021.
8. Hyams C, Marlow R, Maseko Z, King J, Ward L, Fox K and others. ‘Effectiveness
of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 COVID-19 vaccination at preventing
hospitalisations in people aged at least 80 years: a test-negative, case-control
study.’ Lancet Infectious Diseases 2021.
These above three papers all used “Test-Negative, Case-Control studies” which are criticised here …..
https://dailysceptic.org/2021/11/13/the-flaw-at-the-heart-of-the-ukhsas-vaccine-effectiveness-study/
12) This paper showing the experimental jab works is also flawed.
"After the exclusion of 1147 participants who had laboratory documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection before the start of the study period"
Which means they deliberately left out of the study all those who had naturally acquired immunity from prior infection.
The study itself also states "This study also has several limitations." And they go on to list 7 problems with it.
13) Although the experimental jab may stop someone "unvaccinated" with NO natural immunity testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 for a short period of time it doesn't say whether there would be any symptoms of Covid or whether there would be any long term risk from the experimental jab.
Also, although the “vaccination” increases anti-bodies (for a few months only) against the spike protein it doesn’t protect against other areas of the virus. The “vaccine” is also designed for the Wuhan strain whereas Omicron may not be even from the same family as it is so different.
In other words why would a fit healthy person of working age run the risk of Original Antigenic Sin, Antibody Dependent Enhancement, Vaccine Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome etc. plus all the other possible side effects from the experimental jab including Myocarditis to stop Covid which may have no symptoms or just a sniffle?
They would be better off catching a mild case of Covid and have natural immunity than run the risk of "vaccine damage".
14) As for vaccinating children ……
“They are never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, an approved vaccine without getting liability protection. Now the emergency use authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and under the CARES Act.
So as long as you take an emergency use vaccine, you can’t sue them. Once they get approved, now you can sue them, unless they can get it recommended for children. Because all vaccines that are recommended, officially recommended for children get liability protection, even if an adult gets that vaccine.
That’s why they are going after the kids. They know this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children, but they need to do it for the liability protection.”
Also, children are more at risk from the experimental jabs than they are from Covid.
15) Some of the most accurate data is from Public Health Scotland but as it shows the vaccine effectiveness in a bad light they have decided to stop publishing the data instead of explaining why the numbers look so bad.
16) I still haven’t seen any hard evidence or unbiased studies that show the jab is actually working against infection, hospitalisation and death even in the elderly and vulnerable.