Sam Bailey is another one who has a book about “viruses not existing” to sell to the gullible.
- classicrecords1
- Feb 18, 2022
- 2 min read
Updated: Mar 18, 2022
It appears to be more profitable to be a quack than a real doctor these days as shown by her co-conspirator Tom Cowan an ex doctor who handed in his license due to malpractice.
Many of her claims are not supported by evidence and have been totally debunked by real scientists who have shown real evidence to debunk her claims.
She used to be a TV doctor from New Zealand who appears to have little understanding of modern virology.
Her wild claims have been debunked on this science website …...
She has also been debunked here ……
The most recent criticism to Bailey is from Dr Roger Watson here https://dailysceptic.org/2022/03/11/the-real-truth-about-viruses/
I have read Bailey’s reply to Dr. Watson and it is nonsense.
“Watson has not provided any evidence for the existence of viruses here: his argument seems to be that other people believe in viruses, therefore viruses exist. Some people also believe in the tooth fairy.”
Childish comparison.
“Dr Stefan Lanka has also outlined the fallacies of “bio-weapons,” including fabricated “viruses” and how they have been used to drive fear into the public for many decades.”
So Bailey is another one who thinks that the hundreds of bio-labs around the world are not working on deadly viruses and her “faith” that “viruses do not exist” will save her from a horrible death.
“Like Watson, Kirsch rapidly retreated when the Baileys, Dr Tom Cowan, Dr Andy Kaufman, and Dr Stefan Lanka all offered to participate in a live debate with his chosen “experts”.”
These people are very good at promoting themselves on video particularly Kaufman who is also a psychiatrist and understands Neuro Linguistic Programming. It is no wonder busy “real” scientists don’t want to debate with them on video. The way Kaufman hijacked a video conference and abused Dr Judy Mikovits was disgraceful.
“How is a PCR result that “diagnoses” a disease on the basis that a positive result means you have the disease, falsifiable?”
No scientist has ever said a PCR test can diagnose a disease, it has always been known that it can detect a virus but not a disease.
“Official Information Act requests have exposed that the virologists do not do valid control experiments.”
Is total nonsense. Scientists are always doing mock control experiments. For example, this experiment finds cytopathic effects specific to SARS-CoV-2 in human cell lines and, of course, includes a mock control with the same culturing conditions that just doesn’t have the virus added. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17796-z
“the appetite for the content we produce seems very healthy …. the audience still grows every week.”
And here we have the main reason for Bailey and others to abandon what was left of their careers in main stream science and medicine. It is more profitable to hold outlandish views as it brings in more money from the gullible.
Comments